If you want something that you can buy out and just add updates to and keep for the long run, this is not the product. If you are okay with paying a subscription long-term, that's great. With Nitro, the other thing would be considering the cost long-term. Applies to perpetual and subscription licensing.
Simplify licensing across your organization. Centrally purchase, deploy, and manage multiple Foxit PDF Editor and Foxit eSign licenses. Save resources by placing only one purchase order. My advice for users looking at Nitro would be to make sure you have IT to help set it up or some contact or package that includes initial setup. Lower software costs versus piecemeal purchases. So in looking at renewing, that was a factor, as to whether or not we wanted to go with that same product. But when it was time to look at upgrading, I went back through the initial emails with the initial setup, and there was quite a few emails back and forth with the staff and with Nitro trying to get it set up, and it proved to be a bit of a struggle for them. Nitro was implemented before I started working at this company. It was just a matter of finding a package that we could purchase outright rather than something subscription-based. We looked at continuing on with it when our subscription came up and it was going to be too costly. Nitro was decided on before I started with this company. All the functions were there, but the subscription-based cost wasn't going to work for us. And we ended up letting go of Nitro because, just the cost factor. We went with Firefox because of the cost. We continued off with that for a while, until we had to upgrade it. When I first started working at this company, the previous staff had used Nitro.
0 kommentar(er)
